Kysymykset ja vastaukset

VEX V5 Robotics Competition 2026-2027: Override

Tagged: SG13

Welcome to the official VEX V5 Robotics Competition Question & Answer system, where all registered teams have the opportunity to ask for official rules interpretations and clarifications. This Q&A system is the only source for official V5RC rules clarifications, and the clarifications made here from the Game Design Committee (GDC) are considered as official and binding as the written Game Manual itself.

Please review the Q&A Usage Guidelines before posting. This system is only intended for specific V5RC game rules questions.


3231: Clarification of protected Load Zones

13-Sep-2026
SG13

SG13 states that alliance load zones are protected during the driver period. The load zones are marked with tape. The intent of the rule is to protect Load Zoness from intentional interference by the opposing alliance.

  1. Can an opposing robot park in front of the load zone if it does not break the 3-D plane of the tape, and thus prevent access to the load zone?
  2. While a robot is match loading, an opposing robot pushes into it and causes the pin/cup to topple over at the bottom of the loader. The opposing robot backs off, and then repeats the offense when the robot tries to match load again. Would this count as separate minor violations of the same rule, or a singular minor violation of SG13 for the match? Would repeat offenses within the same match be considered a major violation?

Vastaus committee

  1. Can an opposing robot park in front of the load zone if it does not break the 3-D plane of the tape, and thus prevent access to the load zone?

Yes.

  1. While a robot is match loading, an opposing robot pushes into it and causes the pin/cup to topple over at the bottom of the loader. The opposing robot backs off, and then repeats the offense when the robot tries to match load again. Would this count as separate minor violations of the same rule, or a singular minor violation of SG13 for the match? Would repeat offenses within the same match be considered a major violation?

Each offense would count as a separate <SG13> Minor Violation, or as a Major Violation if the offense was determined to be egregious. Repeat <SG13> Minor Violations may escalate to a Major Violation at the Head Referee's discretion. (When contemplating escalation to a Major Violation, Head Referees should consider the context of the Violations within a Match. Repeat Violations involving incidental/inconsequential interactions likely do not warrant escalation to a Major Violation in most cases.)